Monday, April 29, 2013

4/24/13 – School is out for the summer - almost

As the semester draws to a close I am actually a little bummed I won’t be a part of this class anymore. It has been a ton of fun learning and discussing certain topics that incorporate all spectrums of Green Communities.

Professor Goldsmith is now one of my favorite professors…I think he is really down-to-earth and has a very intellectual mind. I am confident we will be able to keep in touch and hopefully even bounce ideas off one another or something.

Today and Monday were our presentation days and they went pretty well, I think.

A lot of the groups had similar concepts or ideas of transition strategies. Some had more and some had less. Either way it was really cool to see all of our minds collaboratively thinking about what kinds of things we can do to make change happen in our daily lives, commutes, and schedules. 

I can’t say how much I’ve learned this semester in this class, but it has by far been my favorite class this semester. I look forward to the potential to going to Curitiba, Brazil next Fall Break!

God Bless!

4/22/13 - When it's on your mind it's on eBay

In my 1/9 post, I mentioned that I learned about a person in my class who has a boyfriend who used to fix iPhones…

Thinking about that now, I realized that I kind of work for a company that already does this (sort of). If I haven’t mentioned this already, I work for eBay. I think that eBay is a great company to work for and it is especially “green” in the way that it promotes consumer-to-consumer sales and business.
Think about it.

You can sell pretty much anything on eBay. You can get rid of your broken iPod, your used shoes, your hand-me-down clothing…ANYTHING!

Their tagline… “When it’s on your mind it’s on eBay” really makes sense and I just found an even greater sense of pride for the great e-commerce company that I work for!

4/17/13 – Brainstorming

As I begin to get situated with my group for our group projects/presentations, we are all brainstorming ideas or topics. The focus is on transition strategies that affect our quality of life and that are part of our daily commute from home to school and from home to work.

Today our group went over numerous categories of change such as transportation systems, food systems, water systems, architecture, and energy. Our next task was to go home and think about some more in-depth ideas that are more specific. As I was thinking about mine – my topic is transportation – I came across my mom’s magazine “Better Homes and Gardens”. 

Obviously this isn’t transportation specific, however, I noticed an article about roof gardens and green roofs. Oila! That is amazing. I saw right before my eyes a transition strategy in a fairly popular magazine that was promoting green roofing and gardens while at the same time telling the audience how easy it is! I love it and I really wanted to share – please see the pictures I took of the magazine below.

















4/15/13 – Group projects

So we are beginning to think about group projects and discuss possible areas to discuss in our presentation.

As we brainstorm our ideas of what we could do, while at the same time getting to know my group teammates, I noticed something cool. 

We are all thinking like an ecosystem. We are all incorporating ideas that were brought up in class that we learned about transition strategies. I really love how we are all thinking together and it is really cool to see how we all “get it.” It is cool because it is nearing the end of the semester and we are all on the same page, thinking collaboratively.

That is the extent of my thoughts for today. I just really think it is so cool to see how far we’ve come. We really know what Green Communities are.

4/10/13 - Urban Chicken Coop

I just had an epiphany. As we’ve been talking a lot recently about home-grown eggs from backyard chickens, a lot has been on my mind about it. I have been thinking more and more about that idea, if feasible and possible when I am out living on my own, how I might actually be able to have chickens and grow my own eggs…along with all the other benefits. Ironically, today, I found a magazine in our house opened up to a chicken coop idea/project titled, “The Skeptic’s Guide to the City Chicken.” I think the title totally fits how most city-dwelling Americans think of chickens (“their place is not in the city.”). Although I personally think it would be more valuable to someone to handcraft their own coop, the ideas portrayed in the article are really interesting and I’d like to share. It’s definitely something cool that I came across and I think it is really awesome how it was right in line with one of our most recent discussions in class about chickens and home-grown eggs.

  
 
I hope these aren't too large, just wanted you to be able to read what it says...


4/8/13 - My mind is transforming...

Thinking of all this composting stuff (compost privy’s, composting waste baskets, composting bins, etc) it is really turning my mind…

As I wrap my head around such a concept, I realize that it is not as “gross” and “disgusting” as the modern American eye views or sees it (myself included!). The more I learn about it in class, the more I think about it as “wow I could apply it to my life.” I just threw away some food and almost feel embarrassed that I didn’t have some form of a composting bin to put it in to save it from going to the landfill… I almost feel guilty that I should have one in my house even though I don’t. This is different compared to my thoughts previously.

Wow, talk about a new change in thinking…

4/3/13 - High Performance Green Infrastructure

As I reviewed and briefly browsed over the “High Performance Green Infrastructure,” I noticed how thorough and in-depth it was. I mean, most design criteria, guidelines, or recommendations briefly browse over and explain the best way they think things should be done, built, designed, constructed, etc. However, this document was at least ten times as thorough and in-depth as any design document I’ve ever read! It seriously went over a ton of stuff! The designers of the piece must have spent a lot of time thinking about the components of each integral part of “High Performance Green Infrastructure,” and what it means in every single way. Typically when one thinks about a “complete street” they do not narrow down to the very minute details of the construction process and materials being a key integral part of it. Yet this document went into that and so much more! I was actually very impressed with its depth of thought and how large and grandiose of a vision the authors have.

This is really revolutionary stuff!

4/1/13 - Guest Lecture: Architecture in the Field

Today, the guest lecture really helped open my eyes to the architecture field. She talked about why she was going back to school—to learn the financing behind the “green” and “sustainable” design she was so passionately trying to apply to the world, especially the United States. She said one of the biggest challenges was that contractors, investors, and clients all want the numbers behind sustainable design. They want you to show them how, on a cash and savings analysis (data, numbers), building a sustainable structure is beneficial to them. She said she didn’t have the tools to do so because in her former education on architecture, she was never thought that. This really makes me hope that the architecture program here at the “u” has such education. If they don’t, they better watch out because I will “strongly encourage” the Architecture and Planning staff and administration to adjust the Architecture and Planning program to not only include sustainable design principles, but also include the financials behind those principles. Thinking about this is getting me really excited for change and for my future as an architect with my minor in Urban Planning and my Sustainability Certificate on its way!

3/27/13

I just realized I could totally use the Green Affordable Housing Design guide that Professor Goldsmith mentioned today in class. I could use it as a guide when I design such structures in the future after I graduate. I think it is really he did that and has part of the collaborative effort to make it happen and help push us further towards more sustainable design in the United States.

Not a ton to say here, but after discussions in class, these are my thoughts for the day.

3/24/13 - Building SMART, Adaptive Places

Really, building a smart, adaptive place isn’t that difficult, but we don’t really think much about it in “modern times.”

Today, with our technological advances, (I’m not basing technology,. I really am a huge fan of technology) we are so constrained to the easiness of technology, we don’t really conserve of anything. For example we use HVAC systems to heat and cool our homes and businesses virtually at the click of a button, using a lot of energy that could be saved, conserved, or utilized elsewhere. Instead of using these as our primary sources of “comfort” in our buildings, we ought to utilize the natural capital of our place to harvest energy, heat, cooling, and lighting while having an HVAC as a backup/last resort sort of thing. This is all in reference to the reading attached to my paper/assignment that is due in a few days—the reading is called “Building Adaptive Places” and is from the book “The Agile City” by James S. Russell. It really is helpful information and knowledge on how to utilize heating, cooling, and lighting by the way we design our buildings and how we orient them.

Since these are “the biggest energy users in buildings by far,” they obviously have the greatest potential to be reduced. I like how the author says he is not going to propose fifty ways to green your home through better light bulbs and caulking your windows properly. He just says that although those are affordable things, there is already plenty of guidance for such things. I just really like how he focuses on the step before the “greening of your home,” so-to-say, because of his descriptions of how to orient the home to capture sunlight, cross winds for cross ventilation and cooling, as well as other suggestions. As an Architecture and Planning student, I can really relate to all of this he talks about. this quote from page 155 pretty much sums up how I feel about the author’s outlook, the design process, and the “before you green your home” concept I described above.

“The Real Opportunity to make deep cuts in carbon, and to live with much lower impact on the environment, begins not with technology but with place, with a holistic approach to understanding and making the most of every setting’s unique qualities.”

When I say “utilize the natural capital of our place,” what I mean is best said by James Russell, “Making the most of the location: orientation, typography, soils, vegetation, cultural traditions, and so on” (pg. 158). This really puts it in perspective! To put it bluntly, all of those things are free! Sun, daylight and fresh are all free, so why don’t we use them? Some of it, to me, is common sense and although there are some excellent examples to do this, I feel empowered to be able to implement this skill in the buildings I’m going to design in the future.

3/20/13 - Designing Around Life's Transitions

Earlier in one of my journal entries I posted about how the suburbs are still exponentially costly when driving the car compared to living in the city and the energy use associated with that…

In class today, Stephen talked about how each part of our city is sort of designed (in a way) around our life’s transitions. This sounds confusing initially, so let me explain. 

Time and time again, Stephen has been telling us that every day we need to build housing for 1,000,000 new residents… Talk about huge growth! So, basically this concept of the city being designed for our transitional lives was drawn out of him talking about the population growth. Think about how when you are in college you are most likely to live as close as possible to your school (to save costs such as commuting/transit), so you are will probably either live on campus or downtown – at least with specific to the University of Utah students… 

Furthermore, when you are middle-aged and have kids, you might want to move out to the suburbs to raise those kids so they can play in the yard. Then, when you get older, you might want to move back into the city for all of its necessities and close proximity (access to transit, access to food, entertainment, etc). 

So, basically we are all at certain points of our lives where we want or need certain spaces to live. Since Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County (even Utah County) is really, for the most part, a suburban city, it makes sense to have all sorts of types of housing available. Depending on where you are in your life, you might choose to live in an apartment over a suburban single-family home. Whereas, in a different point in your life, you might choose to live in a suburban home to raise your kids and then after they move out, you might choose to move closer to the city in a condominium or something.
After our discussion, I learned that it is OK to have suburbia. However, we need to design our cities (Salt Lake City, specifically) in a way that allows dense growth while, at the same time, allows people to live in suburban homes, depending on where they are in their life. 

I think this is almost a three-dimensional perspective on transition strategies. I love it. It is a whole new perspective on the role suburbia has on our cities and in our lives.

3/18/13 – It’s “Bottom-up” not “Top-down”

Thoughts are a bit jumbled today…coming back from Spring Break. I’ll try to hone in and break them down though.

Today, I learned about being objective and finding clues as a prospective planner lacking from the outside in. Instead of coming into a circumstance as an “EXPERT”, I am simply an “OBSERVER”.
This helps better articulate ideas or observations instead of telling people what they should do or what they need to do.

I really learned a lot about finding clues to healing or repairing a place than simply “connecting the dots” or finding links in-between. Then we moved to learn more in-depth about finding ways to celebrate good places/things in the community. For instance, in Israel (as was the area of discussion after Stephen came back from his trip there) they have a diverse and unique set of agricultural crops and produce that they export but they don’t have any “farmer’s markets,” food cars, or produce stands. They could easily celebrate their amazing produce in such ways!

WHY NOT CELEBRATE THE SPECIALTIES IN AN AREA?

This can be applied anywhere, you just have to look for the clues. 

This question  -or- concept  -or- idea (whatever you ‘d like to call it) really makes me think of one of my projects I did between Fall ’11 and Spring ’12 in my Honors class, People & Place. Why? Because throughout the year we had to (in groups) find something within South Salt Lake that needed to be resolved, fixed, or (in these new found words) celebrated. We found out through our observations that South Salt Lake really lacked an “identity.” When I really think in more depth about this I realize that what we observed was that South Salt Lake didn’t have anything to CELEBRATE.

Eventually through our design project and proposal, part of our identification suggestion derived from our observation of the various “old school” building signs perpendicular to the street that stuck out and still had the “fancy” lights on them that lit up at night. Instead of getting rid of them why not celebrate them?

This idea really resonated with me today. 

How can I observe the places I live, eat, sleep, play, learn, and work and transform them in a way that celebrates that place?

I love it!
            New ideas to come.

3/6/13 - How can we Design in a Way that Saves Money, Energy, and the Environment?

In class today, we related a lot of our group work and discussion to James S. Russell’s The Agile City: Building Adaptive Places. The chapter in the book references various ways of how to use free characteristics of a given place or region to maximize energy lighting, and heating efficiently in any given building. The author uses a variety of diverse climate regions as examples and explains how well each region of place has harvested its natural capital. Places referenced include: Hurricane prone regions such as South Carolina; Warm sun and frequent trade winds regions such as California; Extremely hot and sunny desert regions such as Phoenix or the Middle East; Eastern United States regions with low water temperatures and humid, high summer heat such as Philadelphia and New York; Severe climate regions such as Winnipeg (in Manitoba Canada) that has minus thirty-one degrees Fahrenheit waters with icy winds in addition to searing ninety-five degree, humid summers; As well as cloudy cool regions such as Seattle, Washington that have fairly frequent rains.

In class we grouped up and were given a place to determine how best to build an adaptive place there. My group had Seattle. Throughout our process, I learned there are lots of ways to use the local environment to build from. Not only would your orient your building to capture sunlight and solar radiation for heat, but you could build it from local raw materials, harvest rain water, along with many other things. It really has helped me understand how sustainable “green” buildings don’t always have to have fancy gadgets such as geothermal power, cooling and heating, solar panels, or other things. 

They just have to be designed in a way that utilizes the “free capital” in the environment of a local place to its greatest potential. It is an investment in energy savings, economic savings, as well as an investment in the cultures and communities of our places and cities in a way that brings them back to nature with utmost respect.

3/4/13 – Compost Privy

Compost toilet – dealing with human waste

Well today’s class was really interesting and brought forth an idea I haven’t ever really contemplated – the idea that we can turn composting systems into systems that incorporate human waste. It sounds a little gross to me. But the concept and the why behind it makes totally sense.

We are used to not dealing directly with waste. This type of system is a way of coming face to face with our waste. Just as I’ve reference in one of my earlier posts, the more people know the more they value… The same is true here because people will understand that their waste trail is an integral part of the community, local environment, and global ecosystem. It is important not to just flush the toilet and away goes the waste, “Outta sight, outta mind.”

Florence, our TA, was the one who led the lecture today. She presented an interest fact that every three months there is an average of 300 pounds of waste generated per person. That is a ton of waste! Also, this year the world will produce 2.6 trillion pounds of garbage which is equal to the weight of 7,000 Empire State Buildings.

That is so crazy to think about. There is no “out” for us to throw our garbage out, when you think about the planet as a whole.

So these composting systems, although they seem engineered to not be super gross, it is a little revolting to me. Hopefully later on I might be more okay with it, but I am just not sure right now.

2/27/13 – Solutions Grow From Place

In today’s reading in Ecological Design there was some really interesting stuff covered that I’d like to share my thoughts about.  Thinking about how Solutions Grow From Place gets the mind rolling and processing trying to figure out where we are going with this concept.

On page 82, the author provides an important idea, “Imagine attending to water, energy, waste, and land as carefully as you would attend to your garden, your children’s education, or your money.” That, to me, is a groundbreaking idea – yet it is so simple! He continues, “If these skills are a part of the fabric of everyday life, building sustainable communities is possible.” I totally agree and I love that this author has such an intellectual mind to bring up such a fundamental and key piece to building sustainable communities. 

It’s feeding my brain.                                             

“Sustainability begins in modest acts of responsibility.”

Thinking about that quote really makes sense. Why? Because I am pretty sure it has been irresponsible lives that have created unsustainable systems in the first place. People just don’t think in-depth about how their actions affect other pieces of our life or what their product will do to the environment. It really depends on the everyday actions of ordinary people (his words, not mine).

I really like this quote as well, “Bringing sustainability home is about growing a culture of sustainability that is suited to the particularities of place” (pg. 83 for reference). This brings in the idea of solutions growing from place. 

Furthermore, the author describes some projects and examples of designing from place. Basically I learned that we need to observe a particular location in order to create a sustainable place for that place specifically. There is no cut-and-dry solution for sustainability. That is why we need to realize that storm water collection systems are not ideal in a desert versus a place where it rains 80% of the year. 

It is amazing how in-depth one can get with the design components that they might apply to sustainable design that actually takes the place into consideration. It is very detailed: from water scarcity to cross winds to how much daylight they have to the temperature and weather conditions, solutions really do grow from place.

Here is a really good quote from page 92, “Ecological design begins with the particularities of place—the climate, topography, soils, water, plants and animals, flows of energy and materials, and other factors. The task is to integrate the design with these conditions in a way that respects the health of the place. The design works when it articulates new relationships within a context that preserves the relevant ecological structure.” I am going to tie that in with what I write below, then you can see my comments on why I think this is important. (please see below)

On that same page, the author describes wetlands and how their internal processes allow them to absorb nutrients, detoxify substances, and remove pathogens. He talks about artificial wetlands (or constructed wetlands) and how they are now being seeded and maintained specifically to purify wastewater. “When a constructed wetland is carefully matched to the level and type of wastewater it will received, it can both reclaim nutrients and provide exceptionally clean water. In this way, some of our own wastes can be integrated within existing ecological cycles. The constructed wetland creates a new waste/landscape relationship that keeps nutrients on-site, prevents downstream water from being polluted, and provides additional habitat.” 

I know that was a handful, but I think it was necessary. I think that this kind of a sustainable system, as a community really is essential to create an “ecological city”. We all have special gifts and talents that can be to our communities that create sustainable, ecological design such as constructed wetlands, sustainable buildings, utilizing gray water, and other efficient means of design with intent and actual care for the local environment which in turn reflects care for the global environment.

2/25/13 – Car-Free Cities

If we know that keeping our car on in our garage would kill us, why don’t we realize that the inversions in our city are just as toxic?

Learning about Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in class today was a great addition to the reading about “Taming the Auto” from Green Urbanism. Bogota, Colombia and Curitiba, Brazil each have amazing BRT transit systems set up and watching the video about them was even more helpful than with my previous knowledge of those places. 

From the reading I’ve learned how effective car-sharing programs can be, especially with certain incentives. “Subscribers are issued a smart card, a magnetized card with their picture on it, which they use to access key lockers at pick-up points. This card access, in combination with onboard computers in each car, means that the user needs to do very little when picking up or returning a vehicle. Subscribers simply use the cars when they need them and receive a monthly bill for kilometers driven and time used” (pg. 154 in Green Urbanism). “Representatives at Greenwheels (a Dutch car-sharing company) feel that one of the most important lessons about successful car-sharing is that it must be made as easy and effortless as possible if it is to compete with private auto usage.” Making it easy and convenient is the best way to create effective car-sharing programs. I am confident that if Europeans can do it, so can we!


In one of my earlier posts I talked about the Bike vs. Car vs. Bus and attached an image comparing the two. Check out this awesome video we watched in class titled “Bike vs. Car vs. Transit”.


In the book they reference how, in 1998, “a national government consultation document (“Cutting Congestion—Improving the Environment”) was unveiled. The British proposal would give local authorities the right to impose road pricing under the condition that the resulting funds generated be invested in public transit improvements.” We need to do this in the U.S. since right now all we do with our gasoline tax is dedicate it to developing more roads and highways. It’s aggravating how car-oriented, dedicated and constrained we are, as a society and as a nation.

As negative as it may be from commuters’ and car advocates’ point of view, I think car driving taxes and tolls would help with transition strategies to influence more public transit infrastructure and less cars on the road. Also in the book they reference a system popular to commuters where the driving tolls or taxes are returned to the car owners in the form of lowered car taxes. Even though this idea is contrary to developing public transit infrastructure, I really think it could be effective and popular with people driving cars and commuting while at the same time reducing congestion.
Side note, here’s a funny video we watched in class. It ties into this whole discussion – how can we make things that are an integral part of our lives fun?

2/19/13 – Transit Cities – Transit Oriented Design



I love this picture comparison. I saw it in a previous class and still enjoy it as a great depiction of bike, car, and bus. It really paints a great picture of the efficient use of space for the same amount of people – be it in a 300 horse power automobile, a man powered bicycle, or a large bus. Also, as we discuss more in class about this topic, including the corresponding reading, I begin to like it even more. The Dutch government’s national location policy called the A-B-C policy, is an excellent example of ways to reduce auto use and support public transit. Here is an example of each of the types of locations:

A-locations:
               Public transit locations that are situated I city-centers close to the main railway station that are not easy to reach by car and that have limited parking facilities.

B-locations:
               Public transit locations that are easy to reach both by public transport and by car and that are often situated close to a suburban railway station or near other high-quality public transport modes.

C-locations:
               Locations that are situated on the outskirts of the city with a direct connection to the trunk road network and that are more difficult to reach by public transport.

This is important for land use and developing infrastructure to support those uses. 

Also, in our reading and discussions in class, I am learning a lot about European countries being the driving force of transit cities that are excellent examples for American cities to follow. I think there is a lot we can learn from Zurich, especially their marketing through sporting event tickets including transit cost in the price. As previously described in an earlier blog entry, Freiburg is a pioneering example for sure of a green city, not just with transit. However, it is interesting to learn this complementary information to my earlier blog entry about Freiburg’s current traffic development plan. It was adopted in Parliament in 1989 and its four aims are:

1.      Reducing motor car traffic in the town;
2.      Giving priority to environmental friendly traffic: bikes, public transport, and pedestrians;
3.      Promoting traffic calming everywhere, except for a few main roads; and
4.      Restricting parking for cars.
It really is amazing how integrated the transportation system is in Freiburg and the thought of visiting such an amazing and beautiful place excites me. Someday I hope I can travel there and stay for at least a week or so. Hopefully I can make do without knowing hardly any Dutch.

As my thoughts wander and I gather them, today’s discussion and reading were intriguing and encouraging. A quote I really like from the reading was in Green Urbanism on page 125, “Many of these European cities illustrate a concern with not simply improving and enhancing transit, but also providing it in the least ecologically damaging way.” This goes to show that while efficient transportation systems are important to these nations, they also want to find the best ways to optimize them for the highest efficiency while mitigating their effects on the environment. UTA really needs a crash course slap in the face with that concept! 

Also, I learned about the “energy-efficient features” of a new braking system that recovers and stores energy from braking. This new system is shocking but really awesome! And it points towards the idea in our Ecological Design book that we need to change in EVERY single aspect. I think this is a great idea of a transition strategy.

I really like the quote on page 129, “Public transit will never be attractive unless it’s fast and reliable.” It’s true – we need to have public transit be just as amazing and exciting as the automobile. It’s amazing to think that “One third of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions are transportation-related” (pg. 130 in the Ecology of Place). Wow, that means that transportation plays a huge role in climate change and the greenhouse gas effect from CO2 emissions into the atmosphere.
We need to design public transportation in a way that makes it cheap, fun, and more appealing than driving around in the car.

2/18/13 –Unintended Consequences of Our Design

Today, we watched the trailer for the new movie coming out called “Midway Film”. It’s a documentary about Midway which is more than 2,000 miles from the nearest continent. Basically it is a documentary on where our waste goes. Our waste, most of it, ends up landing on the coast of this island and birds mistake it for food. Chris Jordan (referenced in my most recent post) went there and started taking pictures and documenting the sick and dying birds.




This really was sad to me and it made me very somber. I honestly almost cried. It is so touching, without words. And it very accurately portrays the waste stream…where our waste ends up! It is so sad and awful that these birds are dying because of it; it really shows you how the actions of one, more developed, nation can negatively affect another nation very far away.

Also, we looked at the very disturbing images on his website of these poor birds. Check out the link here. Having trouble accessing the link? Just type www.chrisjordan.com into your browser and you’ll get there and you’ll be able to select the artwork for Midway up at the top,

Here are some of the images that I’d like to show you. I’m not going to annotate them or caption them, but I want you (anyone looking at this) to understand that these birds died because of whatever you see in their stomachs.



What are we doing to our birds!? We need to care more about the waste we create, where it goes, and who it affects.

The documentary is supposed to be released in Fall 2013. Check out more details here.

2/13/13 – Working from “Bigger is Better” to “Less is More”

Interesting factoids given in class today…

Every six hours 1,000,000 plastic cups are used on airline flights. 4,000,000 cups are used a day on airline flights. There are 40 million cups used a day for hot beverages. 400,000 people die every year from smoking.

Wow. Those numbers are shocking… 

I learned, though, that we are in charge of one piece of the solution: Our Own Behavior.

What constitutes need?

This was an interesting question asked by Professor Goldsmith today and it was really well tackled by a TED lecture we watched by Chris Jordan looking at the “accounting of the waste stream”.  All around us is so much waste, so much excess. Food, transportation, housing, automobiles, everything is a spectrum that we out to think about NEED as a third dimension. 

Please see the very interesting video below, I really wanted to share it.



I really like this quote from Chris Jordan “I have this fear that we aren’t feeling enough as a culture right now. We’ve lost our sense of outrage, our anger, and grief about what is going on in our culture right now, what’s going on in our country; the atrocities that are being done in our name around the world.” 

“These feelings have gone missing.” It is so true that our feelings are absent from our culture these days… Not just feelings about the wrongs that are being done to people who are within the environmental injustice sphere, but feelings towards what our kids see on television, feelings towards the rates of diabetes and obesity that are going on in our country… All of it. This video and today’s lecture really opened my eyes to this idea and made me want to do something.

Here’s an interesting quote from class “What people don’t know, they won’t value. And what they don’t value they won’t protect.” 

This quote is really powerful to me because it is so true. If you don’t have any care in the world for people who play sports, you won’t value what they do or how important it is to them, let alone the sport itself. Same goes for all walks of life, all spectrums… I’m learning that we need to work on finding things or ways that we can make people more aware of and that way they will value them more, take care of them more, everything. 

This idea transitioned into our next homework assignment for finding the excess in our lives and a few transition strategies we might be able to implement to cut down with that excess. Basically what would I do to redesign that excess?

2/12/13 – Sustainability and Design – Whole Thinking

“…the only long-term approach to building a sustainable is to redesign the details of the products, buildings, and landscapes around us. Such redesign –attending carefully to scale, community self-reliance, traditional knowledge, and the wisdom of nature’s own designs—requires patience and humility. It is a search for the nitty-gritty design details of a sustainable culture, one grounded in the texture of our everyday lives.” (pg. 23 from Ecological Design by Sim van der Ryn and Stuart Cowan)

I really love this quote because it brings sustainability and design down in scale to something that is an innate detail of our lives. The part where the authors reference the details of the products is really interesting – think about how much influence that has in creating a sustainable world. I really love it, it is a simple statement (in words), but it has so much open-ended power.

If we thought about how our products were made, how much waste they generated to create said product, would that change our habits as a consumer? If I knew that a certain product I purchased fairly often was destructive with how it was made, if I was actually more conscious and aware of that I honestly think I would choose not to use that product. I would demand that the producers of that product change how they make it. 

The fine detail of the idea of this scale is really awesome to me and one can either be optimistic about it and say, “Oh, look at all the potential! (for change),” or one could get overwhelmed with all the detail. I want to be optimistic about it and say that there are endless possibilities for change, and that we can all work together with our different and unique passions to drive change in our buildings, products, and landscapes around us.

Specific to me, in part, is the design of cities and buildings. On page 29 the authors mention the very well-known fact that 40% of energy consumption in the United States is from building construction, materials, and maintenance. I am somewhat responsible to help mitigate this large consumption of energy in the design of the buildings that I will create.

2/11/13 - Building Hazards...

I have never before thought of the inside of a building as being extremely hazardous to one’s health.

Things such as glues, resins, carpet, types of wood, and various paints, if not carefully selected and planned for, could be very toxic and harmful to people’s health! This really makes me aware of more things that need to go into the design and planning process of a building. It will help avoid environmental hazards and negative impacts as well as preserve the health and add to the quality of life to the people within the building.

The Design Advisor really helped me realize how careful design and planning can incrementally (through various decisions and components) impact people in numerous ways to their benefit!

2/10/13 - The Affordable Housing Design Advisor

Through doing the assignment on the Affordable Housing Design Advisor and reading Chapter 4: “The Ecology of Place” I have really learned a lot about sustainable design and practices. I’ve learned about several design practices and strategies that can make for better and more sustainable design, especially when I am an architect and can implement these strategies on my own.

Just thinking about all these sorts of various sustainable design processes gets me super excited for my future as an architect and sustainable planner.

It feels like my ambitions want to jump out of my skin and into the world now, today.

2/6/13 – Freiburg, Germany

Sadly and with regret I must say that I had written/typed previously some extensive notes about how I feel about Freiburg and what our class discussion was about and those notes have since been lost and

I cannot find them anywhere…


Oh well, I must digress…

I will do my best to make up for this tragedy with my memory – although it might not do the previous notes justice.

– Anyways – 

To start things off, I have a newfound love for Freiburg after this lecture. It is one of the most amazing green places in the world, in my opinion. After this lecture I even posted on my Facebook status that I was moving there, haha. People's responses were kind of funny. But I ended up explaining that I probably won't move there, as much as I want to, but that it was one of the "greenest cities in the world."

In class, we briefly talked about the Heliotrope in Freiburg. This building is amazing. It is designed by the German architect Rolf Disch and it is extremely environmentally friendly. Check out these pics (in case you are interested).




So this building is basically net zero. Net zero means that it gives back as much energy to the electricity grid as it consumes. Oh, wait. It is actually the first building in the world to create MORE energy than it uses. WOW. That is amazing! Even more amazing is that the building physically rotates to optimize it’s solar panel collection from the sun’s energy. It has a grey-water system and even its own composting system set up, as well. 

This is really a great example of harvesting natural capital.

I really like this quote from class, as well, “We have a collective responsibility to reduce our fossil fuel usage and causes of climate change – for public health in and outside of the house.”
So now class gets even more exciting the plusenergy House and other amazing developments in Freiburg. It utilizes solar energy. Check out the video for this house below.


It's in German, but there are subtitles :)

There are just so many amazing things going on in Freiburg I have to share all of them that I learned about and am excited about. I love that they have a policy set up that requires that no rain/storm water can be let into storm drains; it has to be utilized, somehow. We really need that kind of policy set up in the United States – it is another transition strategy towards harvesting the natural capital of a region, which I am learning more and more of as I come to class.

I really like how quality of life is what guides design – children and families are the focus. This clearly shows how this place has thrived as ‘one of the greenest cities in the world’ with an amazing rate of people living there, riding public transit, riding bikes, and utilizing solar energy and other forms of renewable ‘green’ energy. Their policy that requires that the only way they can develop residential and other areas is that there has to be transit infrastructure developed first is astonishing. It kind of reminds me of Portland, Oregon’s Urban Growth Boundary they have set up to increase density while, at the same time, decrease the effects of sprawl. What a great idea! I love it and it makes total sense!

In the video they referenced that you saving money on utilities is an investment when you are paying higher rent – you are just investing your money elsewhere.

Freiburg is about the community.

All of the stuff happening in Freiburg gets me excited about the potential I have as an architecture major and an urban planning minor. I really love that they have extreme access to public transportation – primarily a light rail line – large access to bike paths with roads that restrict the automobile and give freedom to the bike, how closely knit developments are making them accessible to amenities and daily necessities. All of it, very accurately portrayed in the video, is very exciting and it really makes me want to move there and live there.

2/4/13 – A New “Spin” on Solar

Today we had a really interesting discussion/lecture on solar energy.

Stephen showed us an awesome video from V3 Solar that put an entirely new spin on solar energy technology and photovoltaic panels. Check out the video we saw, if you are interested (see below).

 
I’m sure you might understand now on why I put the quotations around spin in my title after watching the video.

This idea, to me, is groundbreaking. It is crazy that you can use solar energy throughout the day instead of with a single flat panel.

In addition to our discussion on solar panels and the video I shared above, I learned that Salt Lake City used to have 146 miles of trolley lines powered by hydroelectric power from Big Cottonwood Canyon. ONE HUNDRED FORTY-SIX MILES! 

WOW. That, to me is astonishing. Where did it all go? Well, if you don’t know about it you should look up how Robert Moses, Firestone, General Motors, and Standard Oil conspired against the rail line industry to redesign cities around the automobile by building bridges that (by standards, codes, zoning, and regulations) barely made it impossible to have trolley/rail lines on them, and ripping up rail lines and replacing them with asphalt and implementing millions, if not billions, of buses into the public transportation system. There’s a little rant about what I know with that conspiracy…

Anyway, it is sad that we used to have so much amazing, even green infrastructure of rail lines and trolley lines and we threw it all away… Salt Lake City used to have one of the best integrated and developed rail line systems in the nation and now we are struggling to regain a foothold with our TRAX and Frontrunner construction.

Professor Goldsmith mentioned that there were twenty-two RED AIR days in January and the average temperature was 18 degrees Celsius. This is crazy talk. RED AIR days are days you are advised not to go outside… pretty much you are advised not to breathe because the air is so bad for you. That is what we are living in, commuting in, working in, and learning in. That is just crazy and it clearly shows a need to redesign our city away from the car, as well as more towards solar energy or at least some other form of clean (or cleaner) energy than coal-fired power plants.

The only other thing I’d like to add is how interesting it was to learn about carrying capacity and what natural capital is.

Natural capital is basically the natural “free” things in our environment that we can utilize to our benefit. Things such as harvesting solar energy (as described above with photovoltaic panels), using wind or cross-breezes in a way that cools the home, using rain water to irrigate your yard or for grey water use, and even in the social realm where we are all capital of our place and what we contribute is essential and should be harvested (think ideas, skills, and other things people have).

1/30/13 – Structural addiction to the gas-guzzler

It’s interesting how structurally addicted we are to the automobile in this city. You really notice it in extreme weather conditions. It is especially apparent in the winter when it snows.

We have roads made solely (mostly) for the automobile and when it snows we can hardly drive on them and we are dependent on the snow plows to clear an adequate path for us to do our daily tasks – get to school, drive to work, get groceries, etc. If the snow plows don’t plow the roads what can we do? Well, the other day it was ice rain and it basically made the freeway like an ice skating rink. Guess what happened? There were driving delays up to two hours due to multiple car crashes and pile-ups. Fortunately since I’ve switched to riding Frontrunner and TRAX I avoided the majority of this. However, my sister had to deal with it in her commute from our home in Draper to Salt Lake City (Downtown). She thought I was driving that day so she called me to warn me how bad the roads were. She said she had to get off the freeway to take side streets and she saw twelve crashes on her way. TWELVE!

The weather makes us late to work, it makes us more susceptible to unsafe conditions that put our lives and the lives of others in danger, and it causes more pollution with the snow plows driving everywhere in their diesel operated vehicles. 

But most of us don’t have a choice but to drive… Why? Because we are structurally addicted to the way our cities are designed. Fortunately I have the ability (and time) to take Frontrunner from about a ¼th of a mile from my house, transfer to TRAX, and ride it all the way to school up at the University of Utah.

You don’t even have to plow the TRAX rails, the train has a small set of blades they can put on the wheels / in front of the wheels to move snow as it moves. It stops us from putting toxic poisons in the air from snow plows and driving our own vehicles. It’s just something I’m becoming more and more aware of as I take this course of Green Communities.

I know we all can’t stop driving and start riding transit due to our accessibility to it. But knowing it is part of my job in the near future to help change our structural addiction to the automobile and create more ways we can travel to/from work and home and reap the benefits of saving money on gas, limiting the pollution we put into the air, and reintroducing community through our social contact with others instead of isolation.

This is something that really stuck to me from our class discussion. It totally makes sense and it is clearly something that needs strategic redevelopment and redesign. So we have more transit options available to us (including walking) so we can live where we want and choose a mode that works best for us.

1/28/13 – Suburbia is lacking...

One thing that really stood out to me was in the book on page 124 (Ecocities). It references Peter Calthorpe’s article, “Beyond Solar Suburbia” from the 1970s and provides a shocking factoid. He notes that “the average suburbanite using every solar design feature and technological device available would spend ten times as much energy driving the car than could be saved with all the solar design and technology available for his or her house.”

Wait, what? Still using more energy driving the car from the suburbs? That’s insane to think about.

Really, though, it makes quite a bit of sense. The infrastructure costs for suburbs are a lot more than for downtown or denser areas of cities. Also, this points out that the pollution and coal burned, etc. (embodied energy), from driving the car amount to huge costs, not just our air quality.

This was something that was on my mind from the reading, as well as something that I know we can change. It’s just how society is today.